Cases
Hulda Orgnon v. Delta Oncology Associates, P.C
as 16-1557
Plaintiff - Appellant: HULDA PAIGE ORGNON, Realtor and DR. GLEN L. MOORE, FACS, Realtor
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and COMMONWEALTH OF VA, ex rel
Defendant - Appellee: DELTA ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.C.
Defendant: DR. EUGENE CHANG, MARYVIEW HOSPITAL, trading as Maryview Medical Center, trading as Tidewater Surgical Specialists, a Virginia Corporation, BON SECOURS HEALTH SYSTEM, INCORPORATED and others
Orgnon, et al. v. Dr. Eugene Chang, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00144
Plaintiff: United States of America , Commonwealth of Virginia , Hulda Paige Orgnon and others
Defendant: Eugene Chang , Maryview Hospital , Bon Secours Health System, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
CHANG v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv33198
Plaintiff: EUGENE CHANG
Defendant: ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688 Jones Act
CHANG v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE FUND
as 2:2011cv33200
Plaintiff: EUGENE CHANG
Defendant: MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CHANG et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv33199
Plaintiff: EUGENE CHANG , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C PEEBLES
Defendant: FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CHANG V. UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
as 2:2010cv34799
Plaintiff: EUGENE CHANG
Defendant: UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Hunter v. Ohio Indemnity Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2006cv03524
Plaintiff: Ian Hunter
Defendant: Ohio Indemnity Company, Aon Risk Services, Inc. of Southern California, The Rule Company, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court: Eugene Chang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?