Cases 31 - 40 of 219
Stacey Johnson v. Leslie Rutledge, et al
as 22-1922
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Stacey Eugene Johnson
Defendant / Appellant:
Leslie Rutledge, Attorney General, in her official capacity, Erin Hunter, Sevier County Prosecuting Attorney, in her official capacity and Kermit Channell, Director of the Arkansas State Crime Laboratory, in his official capacity
Defendant:
Stacey Pectol, Clerk of the Courts of the Arkansas Supreme Court, in her official capacity
Johnson v. Gastelo et al
as 3:2022cv02581
Plaintiff:
Darrell Eugene Johnson
Defendant:
Josie Gastelo and Joseph A Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Cruz et al
as 3:2022cv02580
Plaintiff:
Darrell Eugene Johnson
Defendant:
Dr. Joseph Cruz and Dr. John Blaney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 3:2022cv02347
Plaintiff:
Darrell Eugene Johnson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv04649
Plaintiff:
SHERMAN EUGENE JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Banos
as 3:2022cv00972
Plaintiff:
Darrell Eugene Johnson
Defendant:
Ed Banos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC)Johnson v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv00276
Plaintiff:
Darrell Eugene Johnson
Defendant:
State of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Kathleen Allen and Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Banos
as 3:2022cv00875
Plaintiff:
Darrell Eugene Johnson
Defendant:
Ed Banos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Banos
as 3:2022cv00673
Plaintiff:
Darrell Eugene Johnson
Defendant:
Ed Banos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Laquan Johnson
as 22-6065
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LAQUAN EUGENE JOHNSON, a/k/a Turtle
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
