Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Charles Moore v. Cleo Tolliver
as 21-13877
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES EUGENE MOORE
Defendant / Appellee:
CLEO TOLLIVER
USA v. Moore
as 21-60599
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Michael Eugene Moore
United States v. Moore
as 21-5048
Defendant / Appellant:
MALCOLM EUGENE MOORE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. William Moore
as 20-50260
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM EUGENE MOORE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ramirez v. New York City/ Department
as 19-1749
Defendant / Appellee:
Ms. Antoine, (Social Worker); individually and in her official capacity, Ms. Eps, (Floor Supervisor) individually and in her official capacity, Dr. Koch, (Psychologist) individually and in his official capacity and others
Defendant:
Vincent Miccoli, (Exec Director); individually and in his official capacity, New York City Department of Correction and Dr. Michael Kunz, (Clinical Director of KFPC); indiviually and in his official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jose Joaquin Ramirez
Plaintiff:
Eugene Moore
Ramirez v. Rikers Island
as 19-383
Defendant / Appellee:
ACLU, American Civil Liberty, Darcel D. Clark, Bronx District Attorney, John Doe, Warden of Riker's Island Slave Complex and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Douglas Wells, Eugene Moore, Terrence D. Williams and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jose Joaquin Ramirez
US v. Maurice Moore, Jr.
as 18-6380
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MAURICE EUGENE MOORE, JR., a/k/a MJ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1679
Saniefar v. Moore et al
as 1:2017at00477
Defendant:
Tanya Eugene Moore, Kenneth Randolph Moore, Marejka Sacks and others
Plaintiff:
Fatemeh Saniefar
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
US v. Maurice Moore, Jr.
as 17-4254
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MAURICE EUGENE MOORE, JR., a/k/a MJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
