Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Cook et al v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Christa Cook and Christopher Derick Montgomery
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., CoreCivic of Tennessee, Damon T. Hininger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams et al v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00571
Plaintiff:
Brenda Williams, Christa Cook, Christopher Derick Montgomery and others
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., CoreCivic of Tennessee, Damon T. Hininger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROSS v. DUPREE et al
as 3:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
Darrell D. Cross
Defendant:
Steven Dupree, Eugene Sapp, Warden Hilton Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROSS v. DUPREE et al
as 5:2022cv00186
Plaintiff:
DARRELL D CROSS
Defendant:
CHIEF UNIT MANGER STEVEN DUPREE, UNIT MANAGER EUGENE SAPP, WARDEN HILTON HALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raby v. Adams, Jr. et al
as 6:2019cv00077
Defendant:
Warden Robert Adams, Jr. and Unit Manager Eugene Sapp
Plaintiff:
Jody Lee Raby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. Wingfield et al
as 6:2019cv00063
Defendant:
Sgt. Lawerence, Officer Eric Wingfield, Cpt. Martha Dukes and others
Plaintiff:
James Joseph Brian Gray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roger Sapp v. Stanley Williams, et al
as 14-15794
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER EUGENE SAPP
Defendant - Appellee:
STANLEY WILLIAMS, Individually and in his official capacity, TAMMY WOODS, Individually and in her official capacity, PAMELA HALL, Individually and in her official capacity and others
Sapp v. Williams et al
as 6:2014cv00096
Plaintiff:
Roger Eugene Sapp
Defendant:
Stanley Williams, Tammy Woods, Pamela Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sapp v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2011cv01100
Petitioner:
Ronald Eugene Sapp
Respondent:
Florida Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
