Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Walker v. Williams
as 3:2022cv00877
Plaintiff:
Derrick Walker
Defendant:
Dallas Field Office IRS, William Byrd and Billy F Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Conn Appliances, Incorporated v. Johnnie Williams, Jr.
as 19-20139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CONN APPLIANCES, INCORPORATED
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHNNIE F. WILLIAMS, JR.
Caldwell v. Miller et al
as 2:2019cv00021
Defendant:
Joe F Williams, Joseph E Whalen, Desmond T Finney and others
Plaintiff:
Deontae Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conn Appliances, Inc. v. Williams
as 4:2018cv03087
Defendant:
Johnnie F Williams, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Conn Appliances, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
Frey v. Davis et al
as 6:2018cv00137
Plaintiff:
William Wallace Frey
Defendant:
Lori Davis, Ben G Raimer, Jennifer F Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Williams Pest Control, LLC et al
as 6:2018cv00135
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Adams
Defendant:
Williams Pest Control, LLC and Lawrence F. Williams
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Williams v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv02892
Plaintiff:
Sandra F. Williams
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams, IV v. Stokes & Spiehler Inc
as 6:2017cv00948
Plaintiff:
Robert F Williams, IV
Defendant:
Stokes & Spiehler Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
U.S. Technology Corporation, et al v. Mississippi Dept of Env Qlty, et al
as 16-60573
Plaintiff - Appellant:
U.S. TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION and RAYMOND F. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, STEVEN BAILEY, Individually and in his Capacity as Employee and/or Agent of Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality and RICHARD HARRELL, Individually and in his Capacity as Employee and/or Agent of Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
