Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Anthony Braxton v. Larry Harrah
as 21-2279
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY JAMES BRAXTON
Defendant / Appellee:
LARRY E. HARRAH, Fayette County Prosecutor, in his Personal and Job Capacity, BRIAN PARSONS, Fayette County Prosecutor, in his Personal and Job Capacity and W. R. CALLISON, Drug Unit Member, in his personal capacity
Defendant:
DETECTIVE C. A. YOUNG, Oak Hill City Police Officer, in his Personal Capacity, WEST VIRGINIA STATE POLICE, in their official capacity, CENTRAL WEST VIRGINIA DRUG TASK FORCE CORPORATION and others
LITTLE ARM INC. et al v. ADAMS COUNTY PROSECUTOR et al
as 1:2013cv00862
Defendant:
ADAMS COUNTY PROSECUTOR, ALLEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR, BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY PROSECUTOR and others
Plaintiff:
BOHEMIAN GROOVE LLC, IDK ANYTHING LLC, LITTLE ARM INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
84 Video/Newsstand, Inc., et al v. Thomas Sartini, et al
as 09-3920
Plaintiff - Appellant:
84 VIDEO/NEWSSTAND, INC., dba 84 Video/Newsstand, VINE STREET NEWS, INC., dba Adult Mart, NU PHILLY VIDEO/NEWS, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS SARTINI, in his official capacity as Ashtabula County Prosecutor, ROSS CIRINCIONE, in his official capacity as Law Director of the City of Bedford Heights, DAVID A. LAMBROS, in his official capacity as Law Director of the City of Brookpark and others
Defendant - Intervenor:
THE STATE OF OHIO
84 Video/Newsstand, Inc., et al v. Thomas Sartini, et al
as 08-4559
Plaintiff - Appellant:
84 VIDEO/NEWSSTAND, INC., dba 84 Video/Newsstand, VINE STREET NEWS, INC., dba Adult Mart, NU PHILLY VIDEO/NEWS, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS SARTINI, in his official capacity as Ashtabula County Prosecutor, KATHARINE LANG BETTASSO, in her official capacity as Law Director of the City of Bedford Heights, DAVID A. LAMBROS, in his official capacity as Law Director of the City of Brookpark and others
Defendant - Intervenor:
THE STATE OF OHIO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
