Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Brooke Pearce v. Doe FBI Agent et al
as 4:2018cv03196
Plaintiff:
Brook Pearch
Defendant:
DOE FBI AGENT, Sophia Perez Heath, Nicholas Chase Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Filipe v. FBI et al
as 4:2018cv00364
Plaintiff:
Victor Filipe
Defendant:
FBI and Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tewania Harris v. Jamie Dimon, et al
as 18-60206
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TEWANIA C. HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMIE DIMON, Chase Executive Branch, DONALD TRUMP, White House, US FBI and others
Harris v. Dimon et al
as 3:2017cv00215
Plaintiff:
Tewania C. Harris
Defendant:
Jamie Dimon , Donald Trump, US FBI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Francisco Aguero, Sr. v. Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 17-50814
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCISCO J. AGUERO, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CHASE BANK, N.A., UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Office of Inspector General and others
Parker v. McCoy et al
as 1:2017cv00177
Plaintiff:
Treniece Marea Parker
Defendant:
Darryl Glen McCoy, Sr., FBI, Biloxi Municipal Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Purnell v. Mississippi University Medical Center et al
as 4:2017cv00009
Plaintiff:
Leroy Purnell
Defendant:
Mississippi University Medical Center, Greenwood Leflore Hospital, Mississippi Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fowler v. George W Bush, Jr et al
as 3:2016cv02611
Plaintiff:
E Sweetie Fowler
Defendant:
George W Bush, Jr, Laura Bush, Barbara Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv00362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cantu v. Moody et al
as 7:2015cv00354
Plaintiff:
Daniel Enrique Cantu
Defendant:
James M Moody, Erin S Labuz, Nathan Husak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
