Cases 11 - 20 of 168
Montez v. FBI
as 5:2023cv01494
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rick Montez
Defendant:
FBI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Leal v. XNXX.gov/Owner/United States Government, et al.
as 5:2023cv01477
Plaintiff:
Adam Matthew Leal
Defendant:
XNXX.gov/Owner/United States Government, FBI, CIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniell v. Fuller, et al
as 5:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
Justin Daniell
Defendant:
James Fuller, Brown County Jail, FBI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luevano v. STATE OF TEXAS et al
as 3:2023cv00386
Petitioner:
Jaime Luevano
Respondent:
STATE OF TEXAS, Governor Greg Abbott and FBI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. FBI et al
as 3:2023cv02188
Plaintiff:
Adam Leal Garcia
Defendant:
FBI and CIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Horton v. FBI et al
as 3:2023cv02138
Plaintiff:
Gregory Dwight Horton
Defendant:
FBI and KKK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Edmond et al v. Olympus Property, UMB
as 4:2023cv00956
Plaintiff:
Lakeshia Edmond, Derrick Edmond and FBI
Defendant:
Olympus Property, UMB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blackburn v. Lubbock FBI et al
as 5:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
Amy Louise Blackburn
Defendant:
Lubbock FBI, John Waters, Sr., John Waters, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Dillard v. Wray et al
as 5:2023cv00853
Plaintiff:
Carvel Gordon Dillard
Defendant:
FBI Director FNU Wray, Att. Gen. FNU Garland, Att. Gen. FNU Rosenblum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Hillhouse et al
as 6:2023cv00301
Plaintiff:
Jay Williams
Defendant:
Botie Hillhouse, Unidentified Deputies, Tony Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
