Cases 11 - 20 of 69
Heromin v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022hc02186
Petitioner:
Ronald John Heromin
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden FCI Butner Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Robert Covington v. Justin Andrews
as 22-7118
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT CURTIS COVINGTON
Respondent / Appellee:
JUSTIN ANDREWS, Warden, FCI Butner Medium II
Pineda v. Warden, FCI Butner 1
as 5:2022hc02158
Petitioner:
Joe Pineda
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Butner 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Eisenberg v. Warden, FCI, Butner 1
as 5:2022hc02152
Petitioner:
Leeland Eisenberg
Respondent:
Warden, FCI, Butner 1 and Warden, FCI Butner 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. Warden, FCI Butner Medium II
as 5:2022hc02049
Petitioner:
Jontaveis Johnson
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Butner Medium II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. Warden, FCI Butner Medium II All future filings shall be docketed in 5:22-hc-2049-BO.
as 4:2022cv00023
Petitioner:
Jontaveis Johnson
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Butner Medium II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pruitt v. FCI Butner Low
as 5:2020hc02232
Respondent:
FCI Butner Low
Petitioner:
Richard Joe Pruitt, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pruitt v. FCI Butner Low
as 3:2020cv00209
Respondent:
FCI Butner Low
Petitioner:
Richard Joe Pruitt, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Freeman v. United States
as 2:2020cv00029
Petitioner:
Gerald Allen Freeman
Respondent:
United States and Warden FCI Butner Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jordan v. Director of Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2020hc02086
Respondent:
Director of Bureau of Prisons and Warden FCI-Butner
Petitioner:
Joseph Jordan, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
