Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Lafond v. Warden
as 5:2023cv00718
Petitioner:
Juvonta Lafond
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Steelman v. Warden
as 5:2023cv00599
Petitioner:
Robert Keith Steelman
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Walker v. Warden
as 5:2023cv00553
Petitioner:
Jason Walker
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Anderson v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023cv00490
Petitioner:
Dewayne Anderson
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden W. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Damone v. Heckard
as 5:2023cv00482
Petitioner:
Lindsey Damone
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jimerson v. Heckard
as 5:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
Rodney Jimerson
Defendant:
FCI Beckley Warden Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hubbard v. Heckard
as 5:2023cv00167
Petitioner:
Aaron C. Hubbard
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Morgan v. Young et al
as 5:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
Dairion E. Morgan
Defendant:
FCI Beckley Warden Young, FCI Beckley Warden Heckard, Doctor Roger Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Magnus v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2022cv00430
Petitioner:
Clinton Rudy Magnus
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and FCI Beckley Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lafond v. Heckard
as 5:2022cv00318
Petitioner:
Juvonta Deshaun Lafond
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden Heckard, United States of America and Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
