Cases 21 - 30 of 109
TREJO-MUNOZ v. FCI BENNETTSVILLE
as 2:2022cv02159
Plaintiff:
EDUARDO TREJO-MUNOZ
Defendant:
FCI Bennettsville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Aguero Alvarado v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, The et al
as 0:2022cv01723
Plaintiff:
Fausto Alejandro Aguero Alvarado and Fausto Alejandro Aguero-Alverado
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, The, FCI Estill, SC, William E. Mackelburg and others
Petitioner:
Alan McCrory Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Campbell v. Warden, FCI Bennettsville
as 0:2022cv01364
Petitioner:
Deneil Campbell
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons and Warden, FCI Bennettsville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jose Peregrina-Paez v. Warden of Bennettsville FCI
as 21-7761
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSE PEREGRINA-PAEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN FCI BENNETTSVILLE
Covington v. Barnes
as 1:2021cv03780
Petitioner:
Demario Covington
Respondent:
United States of America, Warden of FCI Bennettsville and Nanette Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Warden of FCI Bennettsville
as 5:2021cv03025
Petitioner:
Jermaine Emmanuel Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden of FCI Bennettsville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SERRANO v. Warden of FCI-Bennettsville
as 9:2021cv02927
Petitioner:
Luis Serrano
Respondent:
LAMINE N'DIAYE and Warden of FCI-Bennettsville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Corey Duggins v. Warden of FCI Bennettsville
as 21-7304
Petitioner / Appellant:
COREY NICOLAS DUGGINS
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN FCI BENNETTSVILLE
Harris v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv02593
Petitioner:
Anthony Harris
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden, FCI Bennettsville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Serrano, Jr v. Warden of FCI Bennettsville
as 9:2021cv01787
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Bennettsville
Petitioner:
Luis A Serrano, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
