Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ozuna v. FCI Oxford, Warden
as 3:2024cv00144
Petitioner:
Carlos P. Ozuna
Respondent:
FCI Oxford, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Yefferson v. Warden FCI Oxford
as 3:2024cv00093
Petitioner:
Juan Luis Yefferson
Respondent:
Warden FCI Oxford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Yefferson v. Warden FCI Oxford
as 2:2024cv00047
Petitioner:
Juan Luis Yefferson
Respondent:
Warden FCI Oxford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hairston v. Warden, FCI Edgefield
as 3:2022cv00500
Petitioner:
Mario Hairston
Respondent:
Warden FCI Oxford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Toma, Mukglis v. Warden FCI Oxford
as 3:2022cv00084
Petitioner:
Mukglis Toma
Respondent:
Warden FCI Oxford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pary, Christopher v. McCracken County Jail et al
as 3:2017cv00037
Plaintiff:
Christopher David Pary
Defendant:
McCracken County Jail, FCC Forest City Federal Correctional Complex, Delta Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pary v. McCracken County Jail et al
as 2:2016cv01598
Plaintiff:
Christopher David Pary
Defendant:
McCracken County Jail, FCC Forest City Federal Correctional Complex, Delta Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valdovinos-Zamora, Miguel v. Warden of FCI - Oxford
as 3:2011cv00789
Petitioner:
Miguel Valdovinos-Zamora
Respondent:
Warden of FCI - Oxford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Valdovinos-Zamora, Miguel v. Warden, FCI Oxford
as 3:2011cv00683
Petitioner:
Miguel Valdovinos-Zamora
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Oxford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sandoval v. Warden of FCI Oxford
as 1:2009cv00928
Petitioner:
Marcelo Sandoval
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Oxford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
