Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Gomez v. Cullen
as 24-906
Defendant:
GEORGE ROBINSON, J.B. FOSTER, HSA, K. SORRELL and others
Plaintiff:
JORGE GOMEZ
Reynolds v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 23-706
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brian Edwards Reynolds
Defendant / Appellee:
Ms. Grove, Assistant Health Services Administrator, Non-LEO, Dr. Alfonso Linley, Director of Health Services, Non-LEO and Ann Stewart, Mid-Level Medical Provider
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Michael D. Carvajal, Director of Bureau of Prisons, John Petrucci, former Warden of FCI Otisville and others
Cohen v. United States of America
as 23-35
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael D. Cohen
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Donald J. Trump, Former President of the United States, William P. Barr, Former Attorney General of the United States and others
Marley v. United States of America
as 22-1270
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jason Marley
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Dr. Bruce Bailor, MDC Brooklyn Physician, Beverly Timothy, ANP-C, MDC Brooklyn PA and others
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, (FBOP), Officer Hozendorf, Sillah Hajoh, Registered Nurse and others
Salaverria v. The United States of America
as 22-1190
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alex Alfonso Salaverria
Defendant / Appellee:
The United States of America, Department of Justice of the United States, Department of Homeland Security, (USDHS), Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Unidentified Agents Acting in the name of USDHS and others
Defendant:
Retired Agent Jeffrey James Mumaugh, Under Cover, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, (ICE), Director Tae D. Johnson, All Arresting Officers, Present at Illegal Arrest, September 7, 2021 and others
Dimartino v. Sage
as 22-652
Petitioner / Appellant:
Kenneth Pelletier, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated plaintiffs
Petitioner:
Kevin DiMartino, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated plaintiffs, Michael Milchin, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated plaintiffs, Steven Pagartanis, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated plaintiffs and others
Respondent:
D. Easter, Warden FCI Danbury, Acting Warden of FCI Danbury, Current Unknown, FCI Danbury, Medical Staff and others
Respondent / Appellee:
Acting Warden Jessica Sage
Dimartino v. Sage
as 22-244
Petitioner / Appellant:
Michael Milchin, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated plaintiffs
Petitioner:
Kevin DiMartino, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated plaintiffs, Steven Pagartanis, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated plaintiffs, Kenneth Pelletier, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated plaintiffs and others
Respondent:
D. Easter, Warden FCI Danbury, Acting Warden of FCI Danbury, Current Unknown, FCI Danbury, Medical Staff and others
Respondent / Appellee:
Acting Warden Jessica Sage
Casanova v. Brooklyn Metropolitan Detentio
as 22-34
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rayshawn Casanova
Defendant / Appellee:
Wellpath Medical Services and Westchester County
Defendant:
Brooklyn Metropolitan Detention Center, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Westchester County Department of Corrections, CCS and others
Razzoli v. US Attorney
as 21-2783
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kevin Razzoli
Defendant / Appellee:
US Attorney, Executive Office, US Marshal, Top Echilion WittiSec Program and others
Martinez-Brooks v. Easter
as 20-3733
Petitioner:
Kenneth Cassidy, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Jackie Madore, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Dianthe Martinez-Brooks, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Respondent / Appellee:
D. Easter, Warden of Federal Correctional Institution at Danbury, in their individual capacities
Respondent:
Michael D. Carvajal, Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, in their official capacities
Petitioner / Appellant:
Andrew S. Mackey
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
