Cases 11 - 20 of 78
Graham v. USP-McCreary et al
as 0:2022cv01041
Petitioner:
William Charles Graham
Respondent:
USP-McCreary and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Reichling v. Fikes
as 0:2022cv00081
Petitioner:
Timmy J. Reichling
Respondent:
T.J. Fikes, Dr. Lavalley Wood, Dr. Warlick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Saffore v. Federal Bureau of Prison et al
as 0:2021cv02743
Petitioner:
Banita Brandise Saffore
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prison and Warden Starr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gauthier v. Bureau of Prisons
as 0:2021cv02672
Petitioner:
Jason Gauthier
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Saffore v. United States of America et al
as 0:2021cv02578
Plaintiff:
Banita B. Saffore
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Rivera Laboy Trucking Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brankle v. United States Probation Office et al
as 0:2021cv02528
Petitioner:
David W. Brankle
Respondent:
United States Probation Office, Marc R. Grawe, Paul Ricketts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Clemons v. Birkholz et al
as 0:2021cv01886
Petitioner:
Antoine Clemons
Respondent:
B. Birkholz and Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mancini v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 0:2020cv02532
Defendant:
Jenefer Southwick, Dr. Jarod Broadway, Dr. Mayer and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Ferbo Mancini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Durham v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 0:2020cv01250
Defendant:
Andrew Schumacher, John and Jane Does, John R. Becker and others
Plaintiff:
Hal Durham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. FMC Rochester et al
as 0:2020cv00247
Defendant:
FMC Rochester, John & Jane Does # 1-10, Machutt and others
Plaintiff:
Barry L. Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
