Cases 11 - 20 of 65
Clay v. Pingatore et al
as 1:2022cv00135
Plaintiff:
Gary Lebron Clay
Defendant:
K Pingatore, T Brewer, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ardoin v. Bowens et al
as 2:2022cv02255
Petitioner:
Kevin Ardoin
Respondent:
Warden Bowens, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gay v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2021cv00933
Petitioner:
Christopher Daniel Gay
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00430
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2021cv02069
Plaintiff:
Edward Williams
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Parsons v. United States of America et al
as 2:2020cv02681
Plaintiff:
Mike Parsons and Michael Wayne Parsons
Defendant:
U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons, U.S. Department of Justice, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2020cv00344
Defendant:
USP Atlanta, Dr Chakos, Dr Hayes and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wyatt Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2020mc00047
Defendant:
USP Atlanta, Dr Chakos, Dr Hayes and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wyatt Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2020cv02533
Defendant:
Tori Holmes, J. Benitez, FCI Memphis and others
Plaintiff:
Marchello C. Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moore v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2020cv02362
Defendant:
A. M. Owens, Federal Bureau of Prisons and FCI Memphis
Plaintiff:
Marchello Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
