Cases 1 - 10 of 100
In Re: Douglas Pervine
as 26-2008
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS PERVINE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
In re: MCP No. 204; FCC, Reducing Barriers
as 26-3599
Petitioner:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK, RURAL COUNTY REPRESENTATIVES OF CALIFORNIA and COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: MCP No. 204; FCC, Reducing Barriers
as 26-3596
Petitioner:
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Consumers' Research v. FCC
as 26-60511
Petitioner:
Consumers' Research, Cause Based Commerce, Incorporated, Edward J. Blum and others
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
LiveVideo.AI Corp. v. FCC, et al
as 26-1176
Petitioner:
LiveVideo.AI Corp.
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
WHKA FM 87.7 Inc. v. FCC
as 26-1169
Appellant:
WHKA FM 87.7 Inc.
Appellee:
Federal Communications Commission
Cannon et al v United States of America et al
as 2:2026cv03796
Defendant:
Charles Evans Center, Afreen Sheikh, United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Sherod Cannon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NANCE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2026cv02233
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE KIONTAY NANCE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, NATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sherrod Brown v. FCC
as 26-1785
Petitioner:
SHERROD BROWN, JON OSSOFF, ROY A. COOPER, III and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
