Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Radford v. U.S. Federal Government et al
as 2:2023cv00563
Plaintiff:
Marquis Lamont Radford
Defendant:
U.S. Federal Government, Department of Justice, Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Foster v. United States Federal Government
as 6:2022cv00096
Plaintiff:
Anthony Foster
Defendant:
United States Federal Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caudle v. Federal Bureau of Investigations et al
as 5:2021cv01513
Plaintiff:
Allen Okechukwu Caudle
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigations, Department of Justice, Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gordon v. United States of America
as 7:2017cv01105
Plaintiff:
Marshall W Gordon
Defendant:
United States Federal Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gordon v. Siegelman et al
as 7:2016cv02070
Plaintiff:
Marshall W Gordon
Defendant:
Don Siegelman and United States Federal Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Otey v. Alabama, State of, The et al
as 2:2016cv01540
Plaintiff:
Randall Benjamin Otey
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, The and United States Federal Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. U.S. Federal Government et al (MAG+)
as 2:2016cv00318
Plaintiff:
Timothy Woods
Defendant:
U.S. Federal Government and Charlie Tesner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huston v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2014cv00294
Plaintiff:
Michael Huston
Defendant:
State of Alabama, State of California, Social Security Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bates v. United States General Services Administration et al
as 2:2013cv00051
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Bates
Defendant:
United States General Services Administration and United States Federal Government/Courthouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
