Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Matthews v. Federal Medical Center Warden
as 4:2024cv00405
Petitioner:
Eric Martin Matthews
Respondent:
Federal Medical Center Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Matthews v. Federal Medical Center Warden
as 4:2024cv00144
Petitioner:
Eric Martin Matthews
Respondent:
Federal Medical Center Warden and Warden at FMC Fort Worth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hardin v. Warden, Federal Medical Center
as 4:2024cv00139
Petitioner:
Elizabeth A Hardin
Respondent:
Warden Federal Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ellis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons Director Caravjal et al
as 4:2021cv01087
Plaintiff:
Priscilla A Ellis
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons Director Caravjal, Federal Medical Center Carswell, Warden Michael Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hopper v. Federal Medical Center Carswell
as 3:2020cv03201
Plaintiff:
Polly Hopper
Defendant:
Federal Medical Center Carswell, A Gardner, NFN Blaire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. Mercado et al
as 4:2019cv00694
Plaintiff:
Mario Gonzalez
Defendant:
United States, Federal Medical Center and Sergio Mercado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pielsticker v. Wilson et al
as 4:2019cv00455
Defendant:
Eric D Wilson and Federal Medical Center, Fort Worth
Petitioner:
James Douglas Pielsticker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Horton v. Warden Federal Medical Center
as 9:2019cv00042
Respondent:
Warden Federal Medical Center
Petitioner:
Tony D Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Olaughlin v. Federal Medical Center
as 4:2019cv00039
Plaintiff:
Timothy Patrick Olaughlin
Defendant:
Federal Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Collier v. Federal Medical Center Carswell et al
as 4:2014cv00533
Plaintiff:
ReJeanne D Collier
Defendant:
Federal Medical Center Carswell and Ms. Bachus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
