Cases 1 - 10 of 17
United States of America v. Branch (Munoz)
as 24-1987
Defendant:
YACKEEM MCFARLANE, ALLEN COLON, FAHEEM TAYLOR and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Acevedo et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv00558
Plaintiff:
Felipe Acevedo
Defendant:
City of New York, Harlem Hospital and N.Y.P.D. 25th Precinct
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ACEVEDO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv06130
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FELIPE ACEVEDO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ACEVEDO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv57838
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FELIPE ACEVEDO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv07343
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
United States of America v. Branch (Cummings)
as 18-2329
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Marquis Branch, AKA Quist, Bernard Miles, Yackeem McFarlane, AKA Captain and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Armani Cummings
Acevedo v. Clinton County Jail et al
as 9:2018cv00576
Defendant:
C.O. Thowerton, C.O. Brehm, Clinton County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Felipe Acevedo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heredia-Lopez, et al, v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, et al
as 3:2017cv02248
Plaintiff:
Claritza Lopez-Heredia and Felipe Acevedo-Rosario
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation , Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company and Melvin Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
United States of America v. Branch (Taylor)
as 17-3292
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Marquis Branch, AKA Quist, Bernard Miles, Yackeem McFarlane, AKA Captain and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Faheem Taylor, AKA Fii
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
