Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Cybergun et al v. Airsplat.com
as 2:2013cv00748
Plaintiff:
Cybergun and FN Herstal
Defendant:
Airsplat.com
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Cybergun S.A., et al v. Jag Precision, Inc.
as 12-17640
Plaintiff-counter-claim-defendant - Appellee:
CYBERGUN S.A., a French corporation and FN HERSTAL S.A., a Belgian corporation
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellant:
JAG PRECISION, INC., a California corporation
USA v. $1,830 in United States Currency et al
as 3:2012cv01210
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$1,830 in United States Currency, Mossberg 500A Shotgun CAL:12 SN:P267698, Unknown Manufacturer Unknown Rifle CAL:30 SN: 107257 and others
Claimant:
George Uzar, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
FN Herstal, S.A. v. Clyde Armory, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00102
Petitioner:
FN Herstal, S.A.
Respondent:
Clyde Armory, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Clyde Armory, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
FN Herstal, S.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Cybergun et al v. Edo Trading
as 2:2012cv00555
Plaintiff:
Cybergun and FN Herstal
Defendant:
Edo Trading
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Cybergun et al v. Airsplat.com
as 2:2012cv00558
Plaintiff:
Cybergun and FN Herstal
Defendant:
Airsplat.com
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
FN Herstal, S.A. v. Clyde Armory, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01867
Plaintiff:
FN Herstal, S.A.
Defendant:
Clyde Armory, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
FN Herstal, S.A. v. Clyde Armory, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00275
Plaintiff:
FN Herstal, S.A.
Defendant:
Clyde Armory, Inc. and Sage International, Ltd
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Cybergun S.A. et al v. JAG Precision
as 2:2012cv00074
Plaintiff:
Cybergun S.A. and FN Herstal S.A.
Defendant:
JAG Precision
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
FN Herstal SA et al v. JAG Precision
as 3:2012cv00087
Plaintiff:
FN Herstal SA and Cybergun SA
Defendant:
JAG Precision
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
