Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Stanley v. Atrium Health et al
as 3:2022cv00681
Plaintiff:
Julia Stanley
Defendant:
Atrium Health, Daniel LNU, FNU LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Osnarque v. Bender et al
as 3:2022cv00646
Plaintiff:
Yilien Osnarque
Defendant:
Harold Bender, Nicole Epstein, David S. Cayer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Slafka et al v. LNU
as 3:2021cv00428
Defendant:
FNU LNU and M-G-A
Plaintiff:
Michael Slafka and David Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00131
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ra
Kornse v. Aceto et al
as 1:2019cv00300
Defendant:
Gregory Forrest, North Carolina State Bureau Investigation, FNU LNU and others
Plaintiff:
Donald C. Kornse, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Odom v. State of South Carolina
as 16-2121
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER A. ODOM
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, JASON KING, Public Defender, CHARLES PATRICK, Solicitor and others
Odom v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 5:2016cv02674
Plaintiff:
Christopher Odom
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of, Jason King, Charles Patrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patrick Christian v. Rodney Moore
as 13-1367
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK O. CHRISTIAN
Defendant - Appellee:
RODNEY MOORE, DANIEL E. BAILEY, JR., JAMES TOWNSEND and others
Christian v. Moore et al
as 3:2013cv00100
Plaintiff:
Patrick O. Christian
Defendant:
Rodney Moore, Daniel E. Bailey, Jr., James Townsend and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Christopher Odom v. SCDC Transportation
as 07-2129
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER A. ODOM
Defendant - Appellee:
FNU ROBINSON, SCDC TRANSPORTATION FNU LNU, Insurance Policy Holder, FNU LIVINGSTON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
