Cases 1 - 10 of 17
King v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2023cv01141
Plaintiff:
Carey M King, Tearra King, Deoyon Janae Moore and others
Defendant:
Charles King, Cannady Paries, Deoyonte Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mack v. Oritz et al
as 5:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
Johnny Mack
Defendant:
FNU Oritz, FNU Bowers, U.D.C and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Pinson v. Dallas County Jail & Associates et al
as 3:2022cv02317
Plaintiff:
Tahj Pinson
Defendant:
Dallas County Jail & Associates, FNU Miller, FNU Saurez and others
Interested Party:
Marian Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Jones et al
as 2:2018cv00621
Defendant:
J. Dawson, Jane Doe, A. G. Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fitzpatrick v. Judd et al
as 1:2018cv00706
Defendant:
FNU Baily, Rolando Valencia, New Mexico Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
James D Fitzpatrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Escarcega v. Corrections Company of America et al
as 1:2017cv00335
Plaintiff:
Nathanael Escarcega
Defendant:
Corrections Company of America, B. Judd, J. Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carrier v. FNU McKnight et al
as 1:2016cv01023
Defendant:
EMT FNU Albe, EMT FNU Kendrick, Lt. FNU McKnight and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Carrier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brito v. Warden Willis
as 3:2016cv00244
Petitioner:
Ramon Jaimes Brito
Respondent:
FNU Willis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brito v. Warden Willis
as 2:2016cv00635
Petitioner:
Ramon Jaimes Brito
Respondent:
FNU Willis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Anderson v. Grounds et al
as 5:2013cv00130
Plaintiff:
Ruben Solis Anderson
Defendant:
D Grounds, FNU Calfee, W Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
