Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Innovative Automation LLC v. Follett Higher Education Group, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00773
Plaintiff:
Innovative Automation LLC
Defendant:
Follett Higher Education Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-2540
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tranquilli v. Follett Higher Education Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00894
Plaintiff:
Andrew Tranquilli
Defendant:
Follett Higher Education Group, Inc. and Margaret Samul
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
eDekka LLC v. Follett Higher Education Group, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00431
Plaintiff:
eDekka LLC
Defendant:
Follett Higher Education Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv05293
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv05466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Charles E. Hill & Associates, Inc. v. 1-800 Flowers.com, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00174
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Hill & Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
1-800 Flowers.com, Inc. , Abt Electronics, Inc. , Follett Corporation and others
Counter_claimant:
Abt Electronics, Inc. , Sony Corporation of America , Scholastic Corporation and others
Counter_defendant:
Charles E. Hill & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00862
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv00824
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv03377
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
