Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Roe v. Fowlkes Tucker, et al.
as 3:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Jane Roe
Defendant:
Tykeshae Fowlkes Tucker and Nkemdilim Okoli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Fowlkes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Cecil Fowlkes, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Roe v. Fowlkes Tucker et al
as 3:2022cv00749
Plaintiff:
Jane Roe
Defendant:
Tykeshae Fowlkes Tucker, Rebecca Young, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe v. Young et al
as 3:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
Ms. Jane Doe and Jane Doe
Defendant:
Rebecca Young, Tykeshae Fowlkes, OKOLI NKEMDLILIM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gil v. Doe et al
as 1:2022cv00618
Plaintiff:
Patrick Nilo Gil
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Lt. Fowlkes, Sgt. Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Lucas v. Cummings et al
as 1:2022cv00206
Plaintiff:
Amber Renee Lucas
Defendant:
D. Cummings, Tykeshae Fowlkes Tucker, Donald Wilmouth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yahweh v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2020cv01105
Plaintiff:
Yeshua Emanuel Yahweh, Robert Gabriel Love, Gabriel Alexander Antonio and others
Defendant:
Ms. Ansah, Foe Two, Carl K. Kester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fowlkes v. Clarke
as 7:2019cv00182
Petitioner:
Brandon Randall Fowlkes
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Yahweh v. Clarke et al
as 1:2018cv01076
Defendant:
Ms. Ansah, Foe Two, Dr. Woodrow A. Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Yeshua Emanuel Yahweh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cubbage v. Piedmont Regional Jail Authority et al
as 3:2018cv00333
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Cubbage
Defendant:
Piedmont Regional Jail Authority, Robert Williams, James Wodford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
