Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Mateo-Juan de Francisco, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1897
Petitioner:
PETRONA MATEO-JUAN DE FRANCISCO, LORENZO ELIAS FRANCISCO-MATEO and ANGEL ESTUARDO FRANCISCO-MATEO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rodriguez-Granados, et al. v. Garland
as 24-629
Petitioner:
REINA RODRIGUEZ-GRANADOS, FRANCISCO MATEO CORTEZ-RODRIGUES and KEYSEL ARIANNA CORTEZ-GRANADOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hugo Mateo v. Attorney General United States of America
as 23-1573
Petitioner:
HUGO FRANCISCO MATEO
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Francisco Domingo v. U.S. Attorney General
as 21-11864
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO MATEO DOMINGO
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Mateo v. Waltz et al
as 3:2021cv00552
Defendant:
Correction Officer Chris Wolfe, Sgt. Daniel Waltz and Correction Officer Dustin Gonzalez
Plaintiff:
Francisco Mateo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosa Mateo Mateo, et al v. William Barr
as 20-71947
Petitioner:
MATEO GONZALEZ FRANCISCO MATEO, ROSA MARIA MATEO MATEO and LAURA FLORES FRANCISCO MATEO
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
MATEO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv49596
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO MATEO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jose Lorenzo v. U.S. Attorney General
as 20-10875
Petitioner:
JOSE FRANCISCO LORENZO, a.k.a. Domingo Francisco Mateo
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Mateo et al v. TA HSIN, INC. (d/b/a Great China) et al
as 7:2019cv00419
Defendant:
Heng-Rung Tseng, Shou Chuan Tseng and TA HSIN, INC. (d/b/a Great China)
Plaintiff:
Francisco Mateo and Maria Medina
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
