Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Jones v. Warden et al
as 3:2022cv01306
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jones
Defendant:
Warden, NFN Wonders, NFN Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Balentine v. Collier et al
as 4:2021cv02702
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Balentine
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Rene H. Hinojosa, Pamela Thielke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Collier et al
as 1:2020cv00845
Defendant:
Fred Solis, Board member Anthony Ramirez, Brian Collier-TDCJ Executive Director and others
Plaintiff:
Craig W Mitchell and Craig W. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FILING ERROR
as 1:2020cv00831
Defendant:
Board member Anthony Ramirez, Board member David G. Gutierrez, Board member Chuck Speier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Solis et al
as 7:2020cv00060
Plaintiff:
Brian L Edwards
Defendant:
Anthony Ramirez, Fred Solis and Charles Speier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Jones et al
as 4:2018cv04503
Defendant:
Fred Solis, Brian Long, David Gutierrez and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph C. Garcia
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431
Nelson v. Collier et al
as 5:2018cv01145
Defendant:
Fred Solis, Brian Collier, Pamela Thielke and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Young v. David Gutierrez, et al
as 18-70023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER YOUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID GUTIERREZ, JAMES LAFAVERS, BRIAN LONG and others
Young v. Gutierrez et al
as 4:2018cv02420
Defendant:
Federico Rangel, Brian Long, Fred Solis and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Anthony Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McBride v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 4:2018cv01437
Plaintiff:
Kirk Wayne McBride, Sr
Defendant:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID, Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional Institutions Division, TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
