Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Netchoice v. Murrill
as 26-30016
Plaintiff:
Netchoice
Defendant:
Liz Murrill, in her official capacity as Attorney General of Louisiana and Mike Dupree, in his official capacity as Director of the Public Protection Division, Louisiana Department of Justice
Amicus Curiae:
State of Florida, Floor64, Incorporated, doing business as Copia Institute, District of Columbia and others
Computer & Communications Industry Association v. Ken Paxton
as 26-50001
Plaintiff:
Computer & Communications Industry Association
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Texas
Amicus Curiae:
National Center on Sexual Exploitation, Digital Childhood Institute, Protect Young Eyes and others
E.K. v. Department of Defense Education Activity
as 26-1002
Plaintiff:
E.K., by and through parent and next friend Lindsey Keeley, S.K., by and through parent and next friend Lindsey Keeley, O.H., by and through parent and next friend Jessica Henninger and others
Defendant:
DR. BETH SCHIAVINO-NARVAEZ, in her official capacity as Director of the Department of Defense Education Activity, PETER BRIAN HEGSETH, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense and DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY
Amicus Curiae:
FREEDOM TO READ FOUNDATION, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL LIBRARIANS, NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION and others
E.K. v. Department of Defense Education Activity
as 25-2497
Plaintiff:
E.K., by and through parent and next friend Lindsey Keeley, S.K., by and through parent and next friend Lindsey Keeley, O.H., by and through parent and next friend Jessica Henninger and others
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY, DR. BETH SCHIAVINO-NARVAEZ, in her official capacity as Director of the Department of Defense Education Activity and PETER BRIAN HEGSETH, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense
Amicus Curiae:
ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM, DEFENDING EDUCATION, FREEDOM TO READ FOUNDATION and others
Peter Parnell, et al v. School Board of Escambia County, Florida
as 25-13485
Plaintiff:
PETER PARNELL, JUSTIN RICHARDSON and B. G.
Defendant:
SCHOOL BOARD OF ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA
Unknown:
SERVICE
Amicus Curiae:
FREEDOM TO READ FOUNDATION, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL LIBRARIANS, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION and others
Penguin Random House, et al v. Chair, Florida State Board of Education, et al
as 25-13181
Plaintiff:
PENGUIN RANDOM HOUSE, HACHETTE BOOK GROUP, INC., HARPERCOLLINS PUBLISHERS LLC and others
Defendant:
CHAIR, FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, VICE CHAIR, FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, ESTHER BYRD and others
Unknown:
SERVICE and READ FREELY ALABAMA
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA and others
NetChoice, LLC v. Jonathan Skrmetti
as 25-5660
Plaintiff:
NETCHOICE, LLC
Defendant:
JONATHAN THOMAS SKRMETTI, in his official capacity as the Tennessee Attorney General & Reporter
Amicus Curiae:
ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION, THE FREEDOM TO READ FOUNDATION, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Fayetteville Public Library, et al v. Crawford County, Arkansas, et al
as 25-2427
Plaintiff:
Fayetteville Public Library, a political subdivision in the City of Fayetteville, State of Arkansas, Eureka Springs Carnegie Public Library, Central Arkansas Library System and others
Defendant:
Crawford County, Arkansas, Chris Keith, in his official capacity as the Crawford County Judge, Todd Murray, each in his or her official capacity as a prosecuting attorney for the State of Arkansas and others
Intervenor:
Tim Griffin, In his official capacity as Attorney General of Arkansas
NetChoice v. Attorney General, State of Georgia
as 25-12436
Plaintiff:
NETCHOICE
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF UTAH, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA and others
NetChoice v. Fitch
as 25-60348
Plaintiff:
NetChoice, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Lynn Fitch, in her official capacity as Attorney General of Mississippi
Amicus Curiae:
Public Knowledge, TechNet, Chamber of Progress and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
