Cases 1 - 10 of 142
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bilal Al-Haqq v. Evonne Willingham
as 23-7089
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BILAL A. AL-HAQQ, a/k/a Michael Dion McFadden, a/k/a Michael D. Mcfadden, a/k/a Bilal Abdullah Al-Haqq
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN EVONNE WILLINGHAM, ASSOCIATE WARDEN ELAINE FREEMAN, BRYAN P. STIRLING and others
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WARDEN BRIAN KENDALL, NURSE GRISSOM and others
Bilal Al-Haqq v. Joseph Canning
as 23-7086
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BILAL A. AL-HAQQ, Michael Dion McFadden
Defendant / Appellee:
ASSOCIATE WARDEN JOSEPH CANNING, in his individual and official capacity, WARDEN EVONNE WILLINGHAM, in her individual and official capacity, ASSOCIATE WARDEN ELAINE FREEMAN, in her individual and official capacity and others
Bilal Al-Haqq v. Kenneth James
as 23-7084
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BILAL A. AL-HAQQ
Defendant / Appellee:
KENNETH L. JAMES, PREA, EYVONNE WILLINGHAM, Warden, JOSEPH CANNING, Associate Warden and others
National Assoc. For Rational Sexual Offense Laws v. Joshua Stein
as 23-2040
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR RATIONAL SEXUAL OFFENSE LAWS, NC RSOL, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSHUA STEIN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LORRIN FREEMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY SEAN BOONE and others
Eric Davis v. P. Freeman
as 23-6948
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
P. FREEMAN
Randy Dingle v. Talmage Baggett
as 23-1325
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDY DINGLE
Defendant / Appellee:
TALMAGE S. BAGGETT, Judge, ELLEN B. HANCOX, Trial Clerk Administrator, RONNIE MONROE MITCHELL, Attorney and others
US v. Brett Freeman
as 23-4120
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BRETT LEONZA FREEMAN
Fred Freeman v. Warden Kindal
as 23-6142
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRED FREEMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN KINDAL, NURSE DELEON, HTC, DR. MCREE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
