Cases 1 - 10 of 115
R. C. et al v. Cabell County Board of Education et al
as 3:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
R. C. and S. C.
Defendant:
The Cabell County Board of Education, Pamela Bailey, Janessa Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Freeman v. Rokosky
as 1:2022cv00477
Petitioner:
William C. Freeman
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cooper et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
Russell Cooper and Diana S. Cooper
Defendant:
United States of America and Bridgett Freeman, FNP-BC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Cooper v. Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
Russell Cooper and Diana S. Cooper
Defendant:
Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc., Abdulkader Farran, M.D., Greta Guyer, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Light v. Freeman
as 2:2021cv00407
Petitioner:
Morgan Light
Respondent:
Ms. Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Galbraith et al v. Construction Unlimited LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00363
Defendant:
Chris Freeman, Construction Unlimited LLC and Salvatore Cataido
Plaintiff:
Liza Arceo and Joshua Galbraith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freeman v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv00708
Petitioner:
Tykeem Freeman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Freeman v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv03947
Plaintiff:
Susan Freeman
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freeman-Dotson v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2017cv02649
Plaintiff:
Vivian Freeman-Dotson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02279
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
