Cases 41 - 50 of 189
Hollins v. West et al
as 5:2020cv04317
Defendant:
Robert Bullard, Jeanise Singleton, Archie Sanderson and others
Plaintiff:
Kerry Hollins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Campbell v. General Motors LLC et al
as 4:2020cv03256
Plaintiff:
J W Campbell
Defendant:
Luther J Freeman and General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Al-Haqq v. Willingham et al
as 2:2020cv03233
Plaintiff:
Bilal A. Al-Haqq and Michael Dion McFadden
Defendant:
A/W Elaine Freeman, Capt. Valerie Thomas, (IGC) Jennifer Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Al-Haqq v. Willingham et al
as 1:2020cv03233
Plaintiff:
Bilal A. Al-Haqq and Michael Dion McFadden
Defendant:
A/W Elaine Freeman, Capt. Valerie Thomas, (IGC) Jennifer Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashmore v. Freeman Agency Inc, The
as 6:2020cv03179
Plaintiff:
Beattie B Ashmore
Defendant:
Freeman Agency Inc, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1367
Freeman v. Davis Commissary et al
as 9:2020cv03142
Defendant:
Graves Commissary, Davis Commissary and South Carolina Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Fred Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Funderburk v. Johnson et al
as 4:2020cv02903
Defendant:
Spartanburg County Detention Facility, Deputy William Ballew, Deputy N. Vinson and others
Plaintiff:
Paris Laquisha Funderburk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. 701 South Ocean Blvd
as 4:2020cv02277
Defendant:
701 South Ocean Blvd
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lovelace et al v. Wright et al
as 6:2020cv01977
Plaintiff:
Protection and Advocacy for the People with Disabilities Inc, John and Jane Does 1-10, Brandon Lee Lovelace and others
Defendant:
Chuck Wright and Allen Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Phelps et al
as 6:2020cv01067
Respondent:
J Hutchinson and S W Phelps
Petitioner:
Rodercus Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
