Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Smith v. Wallace et al
as 4:2013cv02464
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Smith
Defendant:
Sydney Wallace, James F. Kanatzar, Jeffrey Gedbaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
French v. Wallace
as 4:2013cv00472
Petitioner:
Gerrek French
Respondent:
Ian Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
French et al v. Geico Insurance et al
as 4:2012cv02378
Plaintiff:
Randy D. French and Cindy Lou French
Defendant:
Geico Insurance and James E. Haggard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
French v. Wallace
as 1:2012cv00157
Plaintiff:
Gerrek French
Defendant:
E. Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
French v. Organon USA, Inc et al
as 4:2012cv01414
Plaintiff:
Brandi French
Defendant:
Organon USA, Inc, Organon International, Inc., Merck & Co, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
French v. Organon USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00839
Plaintiff:
Brandi French
Defendant:
Organon USA, Inc. , Organon International, Inc. , Organon Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Henderson et al v. St. Louis, City of et al
as 4:2012cv00560
Plaintiff:
Opal L. Henderson and Opal L. Henderson Revocable Trust
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, The Board of Aldermen of The City of St. Louis, Lewis Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simms v. City of St. Louis et al
as 4:2012cv00314
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Stefan Simms
Defendant:
City of St. Louis , Lewis Reed , Charles Quincy Troupe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ogier v. St. Louis, City of, et al
as 4:2011cv02172
Plaintiff:
Mark Ogier
Defendant:
St. Louis, City of , Frances Slay, St. Louis Board of Aldermen, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
