Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Fry v Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv01026
Plaintiff:
Melissa Fry
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Chesmore v. Muscatine Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv00066
Plaintiff:
Ryan Chesmore
Defendant:
Muscatine Police Department, Motto and Fry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00081
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ad
Fry v. Monsanto Company, Inc
as 1:2020cv00057
Defendant:
Monsanto Company, Inc
Plaintiff:
James Fry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LaBelle v. Bandy et al
as 4:2020cv00146
Plaintiff:
Raymond LaBelle
Defendant:
Cassie Hindman, Bandy, John Mays and others
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik and William A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fry v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2013cv02076
Plaintiff:
Brad L Fry
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Fry v. Walker Group Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00058
Plaintiff:
Stephen Fry
Defendant:
Walker Group Inc., Florida Walker Group, Inc., Land Grant Development Corporation (Cypress Villages) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fry v. Walker Group Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00176
Plaintiff:
Stephen Fry
Defendant:
Walker Group Inc. , Florida Walker Group, Inc. , Land Grant Development Corporation (Cypress Villages) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fry v. United States of America
as 1:2008cv00085
Petitioner:
Larry D Fry
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Fry v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2008cv00077
Plaintiff:
Debra Fry and Debra Fry
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
