Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frye v. ICG Beckley, LLC et al
as 5:2023cv00195
Plaintiff:
Charles Frye
Defendant:
ICG Beckley, LLC and Arch Resources, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Frye v. Ryle
as 1:2023cv00016
Petitioner:
Keesha Frye
Respondent:
Gretchen Ryle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Davis v. Blankenship et al
as 2:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Timothy Davis
Defendant:
CO Shawnathon Blakenship, CO Shawnathon Blankenship, CO Chris Adkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lose v. Bacorn et al
as 3:2022cv00121
Plaintiff:
Robert W Lose, Jr
Defendant:
Felicia Bacorn, Department of Human Health and Resources, Jennifer Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McWilliams v. Frye et al
as 1:2020cv00270
Plaintiff:
Tina McWilliams
Defendant:
John Wesley Frye, IGES Industries, Inc. and ISCO Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Wall Guy, Inc. et al v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) et al
as 3:2020cv00304
Plaintiff:
The Wall Guy, Inc., Jeffrey Frye and JR Contractors
Consolidated Plaintiff:
The First State Bank and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation et al v. Frye et al
as 3:2020cv00305
Defendant:
Jeffrey Frye and The Wall Guy, Inc.
Plaintiff:
The First State Bank and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
Frye v. Warden
as 3:2020cv00067
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Larry D. Frye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
