Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Chapman v. Franklin County Court of Common Pleas - General Division et al
as 2:2024cv02258
Plaintiff:
Tasha Chapman
Defendant:
Franklin County Court of Common Pleas - General Division, Jaiza N. Page, Germain Luxury Imports of Columbus, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ryan Dean v. J. Bissell, et al
as 23-2741
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN DEAN
Defendant / Appellee:
J. BISSELL, IMMIGRATION CONSULTANTS OF CANADA REGULATORY COUNCIL, ATKINS and others
Defendant:
ABC CORP 1-100, BALBIRAN, P. C. and others
USA v. Filthy Fuhrer
as 23-30014
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
FILTHY FUHRER, AKA Fuck Face, AKA Timothy Lobdell
Courthouse News Service v. O'Shaughnessy
as 2:2022cv02471
Plaintiff:
COURTHOUSE NEWS SERVICE
Defendant:
MaryEllen O'Shaughnessy, in her official capacity as Clerk of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas and MaryEllen O'Shaughnessy
Not Classified By Court:
Loriann E Fuhrer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FUHRER et al v. THE HARTFORD LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2021cv05040
Plaintiff:
KATRINA FUHRER
Defendant:
THE HARTFORD LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
DEAN v. J. BISSELL et al
as 2:2021cv09770
Defendant:
BELL JR., TOWNSHIP OF CEDAR GROVE, JOZSA and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN DEAN
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
FUHRER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv07861
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DEAN R FUHRER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FUHRER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv61062
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DEAN R FUHRER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
