Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Golden v. Gagne
as 24-322
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODERICK GOLDEN
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN GAGNE, Field Investigator
Defendant:
TIMOTHY FURLONG, Regional Director, Det. WILLIAM ROOT, Onondaga County Sherrif's Department, WILLIAM FITZPATRICK and others
DOHERTY v. WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE et al
as 2:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Dawn Doherty, F/K/A Dawn Furlong and Dawn Furlong
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, WELLS FARGO BANK, WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL SERVICES COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Furlong et al v. Brown et al
as 1:2023cv02045
Plaintiff:
Douglas J. Furlong, Mirage Beer Company and Varietal Beer Company
Defendant:
Anthony G. Brown, Alan Silverstein, Barbara Wahl and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Kent v. Heska Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv00546
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Heska Corporation, Robert L. Antin, Stephen L. Davis and others
Floyd v. Heska Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv04137
Plaintiff:
Michael Floyd
Defendant:
Heska Corporation, Robert L. Antin, Stephen L. Davis and others
O'Dell v. Heska Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv03832
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Heska Corporation, Robert L. Antin, Stephen L. Davis and others
Furlong-Newberry v. United States Department of Labor
as 22-2037
Petitioner:
HANNAH FURLONG-NEWBERRY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Intervenor:
EXOTIC METALS FORMING COMPANY, LLC
Joseph Jarvis v. Hines Furlong Line, Inc.
as 21-5937
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH JARVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
HINES FURLONG LINE, INC.
Allen v. Furlong et al
as 8:2021cv01692
Plaintiff:
Kent Allen, Jr.
Defendant:
Matt Furlong and Stayve Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WATERMAN v. BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01736
Defendant:
GLORIA C LARSON, LUIS A UBINAS, MARK F FURLONG and others
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
