Cases 1 - 10 of 55
MCCULLAH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2022cv00365
Plaintiff:
JOHN JAVILLO MCCULLAH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, T. J. WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Michael Little v. Warden D. Ebbert, et al
as 19-2543
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL R. LITTLE
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANCIS FASCIANA, KEVIN PIGOS, WARDEN DAVID EBBERT and others
Little v. Ebbert et al
as 1:2018cv00045
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Little
Defendant:
D. Ebbert, K. Pigos, F. Alama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cunningham v. Thomas et al
as 1:2017cv02069
Plaintiff:
Harold Cunningham
Defendant:
J.T. Thomas, White, Ian Connors and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kareem Millhouse v. Francis Fasciana, et al
as 17-1309
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAREEM HASSAN MILLHOUSE
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANCIS FASCIANA, ALAMA and KEVIN PIGOS
Millhouse v. Seroski et al
as 1:2016cv01622
Plaintiff:
Kareem Hassan Millhouse
Defendant:
Jennifer Seroski, Andrew M. Edinger, Frederick Alama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reid et al v. Ebbert et al
as 1:2016cv01403
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Reid, Kareem Hassan Milhouse, Eric Houston and others
Defendant:
J. Ebbert, Jeana Mitterling, M. Barner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kareem Milhouse v. Francis Fasciana, et al
as 16-1834
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAREEM HASSAN MILHOUSE
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANCIS FASCIANA, ALAMA and KEVIN PIGOS
Coleman v. Edinger et al
as 1:2016cv00545
Plaintiff:
Ronald Coleman
Defendant:
Edinger, Jordan, Fasciana and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Darrell Parks v. Andrew Edinger, et al
as 16-1588
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL PARKS
Defendant - Appellee:
ANDREW EDINGER, Medical Doctor, KEVIN PIGOS, Medical Director Doctor, FRANCIS FASCIANA, Mid Level Practioner and others
Debtor - Appellee:
JOHN DOE #1 ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR, #710756-F1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
