Cases 61 - 70 of 421
EZEKWO v. FAY SERVICING, LLC
as 1:2023cv00379
Plaintiff:
IFEOMA EZEKWO
Defendant:
FAY SERVICING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EZEKWO v. FAY SERVICING, LLC
as 2:2023cv00379
Plaintiff:
IFEOMA EZEKWO
Defendant:
FAY SERVICING, LLC, US BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and VRMTG ASSET TRUST MORTGAGEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Goudreau v. US Bank Trust National Association et al
as 2:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Jan Goudreau
Defendant:
US Bank Trust National Association, Fay Servicing LLC and BSI Financial Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Arshad v. Parker et al
as 6:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
Javed Arshad
Defendant:
Shikita Parker, Jeffrey Ashton, Fay Servicing, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv62447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Shannonhouse v. Fay Servicing, LLC
as 4:2022cv04372
Plaintiff:
Hugh Shannonhouse
Defendant:
Fay Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
HAJI PROPERTIES, LLC v. COMMERCIAL LENDER, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv07236
Plaintiff:
HAJI PROPERTIES, LLC
Defendant:
COMMERCIAL LENDER, LLC, FAY SERVICING, LLC, JOHN DOES 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
