Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv09977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
State Farm General Ins. Co. v. Fechner
as 1:2024at00063
Plaintiff:
State Farm General Insurance Company
Defendant:
Marc Patterson Fechner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
State Farm General Ins. Co. v. Fechner
as 2:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
State Farm General Insurance Company
Defendant:
Marc Patterson Fechner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Fechner v. Custom Culinary, Inc
as 1:2021cv01404
Defendant:
Custom Culinary, INC an Illinois Corporation and Custom Culinary, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dr. Kerry Fechner and Kerry Fechner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bermea v. City of Harlingen, Texas et al
as 1:2018cv00149
Defendant:
Jose Herrera, Officer David Gomez, Jr., Officer Alan Ramos and others
Plaintiff:
Moises Bermea
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fechner v. Pharmatech LLC et al
as 0:2016cv62746
Plaintiff:
Fechner and Tamara Fechner
Defendant:
Pharmatech LLC and Raidel Figueroa
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jackson v. Davey et al
as 1:2014cv01477
Plaintiff:
Vance D Jackson
Defendant:
Dave Davey, Marshall Fechner and K. J. Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Davey, et al.
as 1:2014cv01311
Plaintiff:
Vance D Jackson
Defendant:
Dave Davey and Marshall Fechner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al v. Warden
as 1:2014cv01057
Petitioner:
Vance D Jackson
Respondent:
Warden and I. Fechner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mireles et al vs. City of Harlingen et al
as 1:2013cv00081
Plaintiff:
Denise Mireles and Jennifer Nino
Defendant:
City of Harlingen , City of Harlingen Police Department Dispatch , City of Harlingen Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.