Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv11875
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Parrish v. Fedex Freight., et al et al
as 3:2014cv00321
Plaintiff:
Gary Parrish
Defendant:
Fedex Freight., et al and Unknown Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00419
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Northrich Company v. Group Transportation Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01161
Plaintiff:
Northrich Company
Defendant:
Group Transportation Services, Inc. and FedEx Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Basso v. Life Insurance Company of North America et al
as 3:2012cv00976
Plaintiff:
Lynn Basso
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America and FedEx Freight System, Inc. Group Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Cherry v. Issa et al
as 1:2012cv00040
Plaintiff:
Robert Cherry
Defendant:
Adnan Issa and FedEx Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00606
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams v. FedEx Freight et al
as 5:2012cv00060
Plaintiff:
James Corey Adams
Defendant:
FedEx Freight and Michael R. Huffer
Movant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky Transportation Cabinet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Weirick v. Hartford Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2011cv02132
Plaintiff:
Victor Weirick
Defendant:
Hartford Life Insurance Company and Group Long Term Disability Plan for Employees of Fedex Freight East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
