Cases 21 - 30 of 48
BANKS v. ROE et al
as 2:2017mc00604
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
ADRIAN ROE, MARK R. HORNAK, ROBERT CESSAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2017mc00515
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ADRIAN ROE, MARK R. HORNAK and others
UNITED TRIBES OF AMERICA et al v. MCKEESPORT POST OFFICE et al
as 2:2016mc00972
Plaintiff:
UNITED TRIBES OF AMERICA and NOON BEAR
Defendant:
MCKEESPORT POST OFFICE, SENTENCING DESIGNATION AND COMPUTATION CENTER, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS and others
BANKS v. DISNEY et al
as 2:2016mc00650
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
DISNEY, DISNEY RESPORTS, ORLANDO POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
BANKS v. WIETZMAN et al
as 2:2016mc00058
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
MARK G. WIETZMAN, DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, MERIT SYSTEM PROTECTION BOARD US DEPT OF JUSTICE and others
BROWN v. VALSUKA et al
as 2:2015cv01439
Plaintiff:
HAMILTON BROWN
Defendant:
KRISTIN VALSUKA, CYNTHIA MCSWIGGIN, ORLANDO HARPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. HICKMAN et al
as 2:2015cv01342
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
DAVID HICKMAN, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. PERDENE et al
as 2:2015cv01346
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
WARDEN PERDENE, ORLANDO HARPER, US ATTORNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
VIOLA v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2015cv00242
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. VIOLA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
BANKS v. MABUS et al
as 2:2015cv00814
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
RAY MABUS, SAM ERHART, NCIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
