Cases 61 - 70 of 151
BANKS v. WIETZMAN et al
as 2:2016mc00058
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
MARK G. WIETZMAN, DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, MERIT SYSTEM PROTECTION BOARD US DEPT OF JUSTICE and others
MARTINEZ v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2015cv06496
Plaintiff:
GILBERT M. MARTINEZ
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ROSLYNN MAUSKOFF, ROSEMARY S. POOLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. VALSUKA et al
as 2:2015cv01439
Plaintiff:
HAMILTON BROWN
Defendant:
KRISTIN VALSUKA, CYNTHIA MCSWIGGIN, ORLANDO HARPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. HICKMAN et al
as 2:2015cv01342
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
DAVID HICKMAN, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. PERDENE et al
as 2:2015cv01346
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
WARDEN PERDENE, ORLANDO HARPER, US ATTORNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
VIOLA v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2015cv00242
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. VIOLA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Banks v. Perdene et al
as 1:2015cv01854
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Perdene, Orlando Harper, U.S. Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
NOLEN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 2:2015cv05062
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN NOLEN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR U.S. ATTORNEYS and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
LAZAR v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
as 2:2015cv03648
Plaintiff:
STEVEN LAZAR
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
