Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Carr v. Federal Protective Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00426
Plaintiff: Deaudry Eugene Carr, Jr.
Defendant: Federal Protective Services and San Francisco County Sheriffs Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mina Boules v. United States of America; Federal Protective Service et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv08891
Defendant: Paragon Systems, Inc, Lieutenant Lott, Security Officer Sandoval and others
Plaintiff: Mina Boules
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Mina Boules v. Federal Protective Service et al
as 8:2023cv01962
Plaintiff: Mina Boules
Defendant: Federal Protective Service, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States General Services Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Kamath v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv03531
Plaintiff: RESHMA KAMATH
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco Police Department and Federal Protective Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Angelica Clark, et al v. Gabriel Russell, et al
as 22-35276
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANGELICA CLARK, ELLEN GASS, NATHANIEL WEST and others
Defendant / Appellee: GABRIEL RUSSELL, ALLEN JONES, RUSSELL E. BURGER and others
Defendant: CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary United States Department of Homeland Security, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Deputy Secretary United States Department of Homeland Security, JOHN DOE SUPERVISORY AND PATROL-LEVEL DEFENDANTS, 1-140; agents of the U.S. Marshals Service, Federal Protective Service, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Customs and Border Protection, acting in concert and in their individual capacitie and others
Mark Brnovich, et al v. Joseph Biden, et al
as 22-15518
Plaintiff / Appellee: MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, STATE OF ARIZONA, AL REBLE and others
Defendant / Appellant: JOSEPH R. BIDEN, in his official capacity as President of the United States, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Angelica Clark, et al v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 21-35560
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANGELICA CLARK, ELLEN GASS, NATHANIEL WEST and others
Plaintiff: ROBERT EVANS and GARRISON DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee: CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary United States Department of Homeland Security and KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Deputy Secretary United States Department of Homeland Security
Defendant: JOHN DOE SUPERVISORY AND PATROL-LEVEL DEFENDANTS, 1-140; agents of the U.S. Marshals Service, Federal Protective Service, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Customs and Border Protection, acting in concert and in their individual capacitie, GABRIEL RUSSELL, ALLEN JONES and others
Marilu Touma v. EEOC, et al
as 20-56126
Defendant / Appellee: DOES, 1 through 10, Inclusive, EEOC EMPLOYEE, 1, 2, 3, PARADOM, Unknown officer name and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARILU F. TOUMA
Western States Center, Inc., et al v. USDHS, et al
as 20-35949
Defendant / Appellant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, FEDERAL PROTECTIVE SERVICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: SARA D. EDDIE, an individual, KARIN A. POWER, Oregon State Representative, an elected official, JANELLE S. BYNUM, Oregon State Representative, an elected official and others
Rosenblum v. John Does 1-10 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv01161
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Marshals Service, United States Customs and Border Protection Service and others
Plaintiff: Ellen Rosenblum
Amicus Curiae: City of Portland, Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?