Cases 1 - 10 of 20
SMITH, JR. v. BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
as 2:2024cv01718
Plaintiff:
ENOS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
GROSSWALD v. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
STEVEN GROSSWALD
Defendant:
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF PHILADELPHIA and THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Estrada v. Federal Reserve Bank et al
as 2:2023cv00494
Plaintiff:
Michael Estrada
Defendant:
Federal Reserve Bank and Jerome Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Prince v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York
as 1:2022cv09394
Plaintiff:
Beowulf Adalbert Von Prince
Defendant:
Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Claiborne v. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
as 3:2019cv00250
Defendant:
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
Plaintiff:
Shanta Y Claiborne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Holger et al v. Burgess et al
as 3:2018cv00277
Defendant:
State of Alaska Inc., Shawn Rice, Families Matter LLP and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Holger and Michael Anthony Ogle
Mathi v. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
as 1:2016cv03182
Plaintiff:
Prem Mathi
Defendant:
Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SATHIANMURTHY v. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2014cv05186
Plaintiff:
SATHIAN G. SATHIANMURTHY
Defendant:
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WISE v. FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD
as 1:2012cv01636
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. WISE
Defendant:
FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
ABDULLAH v. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2012cv01677
Plaintiff:
WANDA ABDULLAH
Defendant:
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
