Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Carter v. Utica Police Department et al
as 6:2023cv01122
Plaintiff:
Mac Allen Carter
Defendant:
Utica Police Department, Vincent R. Parrotta, Ray L. Kellogg, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FELIX-SANTANA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19108
Plaintiff:
JULIO ENRIQUE FELIX-SANTANA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Felix-Santana et al v. Hospital Hermanos Melendez, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01302
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Felix-Santana
Defendant:
Hospital Hermanos Melendez, Inc., Vega Alta Community Health, Inc. , Rosa Vazquez-Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Santana v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv12040
Plaintiff:
Felix Santana
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Triple-S Salud, Inc. et al v. Medical Card System, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv02111
Plaintiff:
Triple-S Salud, Inc. , Triple-S Management Corporation and Triple-C, Inc.
Defendant:
Medical Card System, Inc. , MCS Health Management Options, Inc. , Julio Julia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Charles Santana-Castro, et al v. Pedro Toledo-Davila, et al
as 08-1964
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES SANTANA-CASTRO, FELIX SANTANA-CARMONA and AIDA SANTANA-CASTRO
Defendant - Appellee:
PEDRO TOLEDO-DAVILA, Superintendent of the Puerto Rico Police Department, JOSE RAMOS-GONZALEZ, Commander of Fajardo Region, JOSE LEBRON-ALICEA, Supervisor and others
Santana-Castro et al v. Toledo-Davila et al
as 3:2007cv01826
Plaintiff:
Charles Santana-Castro, Charles Santana-Castro, Felix Santana-Carmona and others
Defendant:
Pedro Toledo-Davila, Jose J. Ramos-Gonzalez, Jose Lebron-Alicea and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
