Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02499
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jara Ochoa et al v. Lin et al
as 1:2026cv00572
Plaintiff:
Roger Eduardo Jara Ochoa, Edison Omar Magallanes Castro and Olger Florencio Nugra Guzman
Defendant:
Ding Feng Lin Construction LLC
Respondent:
Maoyun Lin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv14355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lin v. Bondi
as 25-439
Petitioner:
FENG LIN
Respondent:
PAMELA BONDI, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv08771
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv08118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05862
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gomez Cruz et al v. Ding Feng Lin Construction LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02657
Plaintiff:
Jose Reynaldo Perez, Jose Esposorio Gomez Cruz, Junior and others
Defendant:
Ding Feng Lin Construction LLC doing business as Ding Feng Lin Construction LLC and He Shun Chen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
