Cases 1 - 10 of 20
YANG v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA DHS et al
as 2:2025cv03664
Plaintiff:
YINAN YANG
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA DHS, SHANICE WILLIAMS, ULAYSHA MATHIES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yang et al v. Columbus Life Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv07673
Plaintiff:
Yong Hua Yang and Feng Yang
Defendant:
Columbus Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08972
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04757
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Zinkia Entertainment v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv01700
Plaintiff:
Zinkia Entertainment
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, kylebuy, ma47k_505941 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Yang v. Sensenig
as 3:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
Cai Feng Yang
Defendant:
Lester Sensenig and Lester N. Sensenig
Not Classified By Court:
David Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Liberated Syndication, Inc. v. Zhang et al
as 1:2020cv03494
Defendant:
Jing Zhang, Hongcheng Zhang, Chong Zhang and others
Plaintiff:
Liberated Syndication, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Zhang v. J R Sushi 2 Inc et al
as 1:2020cv02555
Defendant:
J R Sushi 2 Inc, Kai Tuan Wang and Yi Feng Yang
Plaintiff:
Guo Li Zhang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04619
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706
Yang v. Session
as 17-1706
Petitioner:
Feng Yang
Respondent:
Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
