Cases 1 - 10 of 39
WOODALL v. MONROEVILLE POLICE et al
as 2:2023cv01370
Plaintiff:
JASON MICHAEL WOODALL
Defendant:
MONROEVILLE POLICE, SHEETZ CONVENIENCE STORE & GAS STATION, MAGISTRATE JEFFREY L. HERBST and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Moore v. Plachko et al
as 1:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
Braxton J. Moore
Defendant:
David A. Plachko, Joseph C. Ferraro, Michael A. O'Pake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FERRARO v. Kijakazi,Acting Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021cv04674
Plaintiff:
ELISA FERRARO
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Ferraro et al v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY (GEICO)
as 2:2020cv02787
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Ferraro and Sharon Ferraro
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY (GEICO)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. LT. BASHOR et al
as 1:2020cv00130
Defendant:
SGT, SEELINGER, LT. BASHOR, TAYLOR ROBINSON and others
Plaintiff:
ORLANDO SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
FERRARO v. JUUL LABS INC. et al
as 2:2019cv04979
Defendant:
ABC CORPORATION #1-25, JANE ROES #1-25, JOHN DOES #1-25 and others
Plaintiff:
GIOVANNI FERRARO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FERRARO v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv03374
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA FERRARO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARHAM v. DLG DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017cv01538
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BARHAM
Defendant:
DLG DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, DALE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. , JAY FERRARO and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 0276
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
