Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Perez v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv02145
Plaintiff:
Fidel Rodriguez Perez
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rodriguez, Jr. v. USA
as 4:2023cv00695
Petitioner:
Fidel Rodriguez, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rodriguez v. Garrido
as 4:2023cv00486
Petitioner:
Fidel Rodriguez, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America and Freddy Garrido, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Montez v. Aguirre & Gonzalez et al
as 5:2023cv00448
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rick Montez
Defendant:
Aguirre & Gonzalez, Ramos & Del Cueto, Jeffrey C. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez, Jr. v. USA
as 4:2023cv00178
Plaintiff:
Fidel Rodriguez, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Rodriguez v. USA
as 3:2022cv00029
Petitioner:
Fidel Rodriguez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
McDonald et al v. Longley et al
as 1:2019cv00219
Defendant:
Randall O Sorrels, David C Kent, Christy Amuny and others
Plaintiff:
Tony K McDonald, Joshua B Hammer, Mark S Pulliam and others
Petitioner:
Ken Paxton and Goldwater Institute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fidel Rodriguez Robles v. El Indio Totilleria, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv00771
Defendant:
El Indio Totilleria, El Indio Totilleria, Inc. and Humberto Sanchez Trust
Plaintiff:
Fidel Rodriguez Robles
Fidel Rodriguez Robles v. Mings Auto Corporation et al
as 8:2018cv00773
Defendant:
Fenyu Huang Lin Trust, Lin Family Trust, Mings Auto Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Fidel Rodriguez Robles
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
