Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Garcia v. John Peter Smith Hospital et al
as 4:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Caesar Javier Garcia and Byron J Warren
Defendant:
John Peter Smith Hospital, Chase Bank, Mattel Inc Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kapadia v. Texas Instruments, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00443
Plaintiff:
Viral Kapadia
Defendant:
Texas Instruments, Inc., Fidelity Investments, Inc., The Vanguard Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Rivero v. Fidelity Investments Inc.
as 4:2018cv00909
Defendant:
Fidelity Investments, Inc., Fidelity Investments Inc. and Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC
Plaintiff:
Carmela Rivero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C. et al v. Fidelity Investments, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv01090
Plaintiff:
Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C. and LPL Licensing, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Fidelity Investments, Inc., Fidelity Brokerage Services, LLC and FMR LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C. et al v. AAA Life Insurance Company
as 2:2013cv01081
Counter Defendant:
Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C.
Consolidated Defendant:
Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd., American Express Marketing & Development Corp., American Airlines, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
American Express Centurion Bank, Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd., Verizon Communications, Inc. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
LPL Licensing, L.L.C.
Defendant:
AAA Life Insurance Company and AT&T Services, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Scott Woloson, Antonio Piazza and David Folsom
Petitioner:
Yesmail, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Hunt-Roberts v. Fidelity Investments, Inc. et al.
as 1:2011cv00158
Defendant:
William David Eady, Fidelity Employer Services Company LLC and Fidelity Investments, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Glenda S. Hunt-Roberts
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
