Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00052
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00198
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Crosby v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00059
Plaintiff: Fielding Stanley Crosby
Defendant: United States of America
Interested Party: Torts Branch USDOJ
Barefoot v. Fields, et al.
as 5:2023ct03293
Plaintiff: Otha Ray Barefoot
Defendant: Unknown Defendant, Tia N. Fields, Officer A. Colaire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01334
Plaintiff: Herbert Fields, Jr.
Defendant: United States of America
Interested Party: Torts Branch USDOJ
Walters v. Hawkins et al
as 5:2023ct03207
Plaintiff: Travis L. Walters
Defendant: Shanticia Hawkins, Unit Manager Reams, John Doe Lieutenant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kaufmann v. Fields
as 5:2023ct03045
Plaintiff: Chase Kaufmann
Defendant: Deputy B. Fields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Thomas et al
as 5:2022ct03132
Plaintiff: Darius Watson
Defendant: Charlie Thomas, Martin Wasielewski, Rebecca Brigman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2022hc02048
Petitioner: Kenneth Fields
Respondent: State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clifton v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00054
Defendant: Xome, Inc., Citibank, N.A., John Doe and others
Plaintiff: William Hobart Clifton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?